Public-domain original
CHAPTER XI
THE VARIOUS SYSTEMS OF LEGISLATION
If we ask in what precisely consists the greatest good of all, which
should be the end of every system of legislation, we shall find it
reduce itself to two main objects, liberty and equality--liberty,
because all particular dependence means so much force taken from the
body of the State, and equality, because liberty cannot exist without
it.
I have already defined civil liberty; by equality, we should
understand, not that the degrees of power and riches are to be
absolutely identical for everybody; but that power shall never be
great enough for violence, and shall always be exercised by virtue of
rank and law; and that, in respect of riches, no citizen shall ever be
wealthy enough to buy another, and none poor enough to be forced to
sell himself: which implies, on the part of the great, moderation
in goods and position, and, on the side of the common sort, moderation
in avarice and covetousness.
Such equality, we are told, is an unpractical ideal that cannot
actually exist. But if its abuse is inevitable, does it follow that we
should not at least make regulations concerning it? It is precisely
because the force of circumstances tends continually to destroy
equality that the force of legislation should always tend to its
maintenance.
But these general objects of every good legislative system need
modifying in every country in accordance with the local situation
and the temper of the inhabitants; and these circumstances should
determine, in each case, the particular system of institutions which
is best, not perhaps in itself, but for the State for which it is
destined. If, for instance, the soil is barren and unproductive, or
the land too crowded for its inhabitants, the people should turn
to industry and the crafts, and exchange what they produce for the
commodities they lack. If, on the other hand, a people dwells in rich
plains and fertile slopes, or, in a good land, lacks inhabitants, it
should give all its attention to agriculture, which causes men to
multiply, and should drive out the crafts, which would only result in
depopulation, by grouping in a few localities the few inhabitants there
are. If a nation dwells on an extensive and convenient coast-line,
let it cover the sea with ships and foster commerce and navigation. It
will have a life that will be short and glorious. If, on its coasts,
the sea washes nothing but almost inaccessible rocks, let it remain
barbarous and ichthyophagous: it will have a quieter, perhaps a better,
and certainly a happier life. In a word, besides the principles that
are common to all, every nation has in itself something that gives them
a particular application, and makes its legislation peculiarly its own.
Thus, among the Jews long ago and more recently among the Arabs, the
chief object was religion, among the Athenians letters, at Carthage and
Tyre commerce, at Rhodes shipping, at Sparta war, at Rome virtue. The
author of The Spirit of the Laws has shown with many examples by
what art the legislator directs the constitution towards each of these
objects.
What makes the constitution of a State really solid and lasting is
the due observance of what is proper, so that the natural relations
are always in agreement with the laws on every point, and law only
serves, so to speak, to assure, accompany and rectify them. But if
the legislator mistakes his object and adopts a principle other than
circumstances naturally direct; if his principle makes for servitude
while they make for liberty, or if it makes for riches, while they
make for populousness, or if it makes for peace, while they make
for conquest--the laws will insensibly lose their influence, the
constitution will alter, and the State will have no rest from trouble
till it is either destroyed or changed, and nature has resumed her
invincible sway.
If the object is to give the State consistency, bring the two
extremes as near to each other as possible; allow neither rich men
nor beggars. These two estates, which are naturally inseparable, are
equally fatal to the common good; from the one come the friends of
tyranny, and from the other tyrants. It is always between them that
public liberty is put up to auction; the one buys, and the other sells.
"Any branch of foreign commerce," says M. d'Argenson, "creates on
the whole only apparent advantage for the kingdom in general; it may
enrich some individuals, or even some towns; but the nation as a whole
gains nothing by it, and the people is no better off."